The Pharisians
(A meditation on the parable of The Pharisee and the Tax Collector. Lk.18: 9-14)
Pharisian Institute is the name of a large international Society. Its members are called Pharisians. It is one of the largest Congregations. Its members are scattered throughout the world. Their special charism is legal matters. They are specially trained to speak logically and to argue cases. Its members need to have a thorough knowledge of the law.
I do not
know whether you had the privilege of meeting some of its members. I had a friend who was a member of this society. We
lived together in the same community for some years. He was orderly and
disciplined. He dressed neatly and walked straight. He would rise on time, and come
to pray ahead of others. He meditated on the Gospel of the day and read an
article of the Constitution each day. He would sit on one of the front benches. He wanted others not only to notice
him but also to imitate him. He would skip food twice a week and he would make
sure others knew about it. When praying his
head would be bent anywhere between fifteen to twenty degrees. He wore a long
white robe on most of the days, especially on days of fast. He was exteriorly
stiff and legally almost ’blameless’.
But he had a serious problem. He could not get
along with other people. He demanded his austere style of life from others. He
was a workaholic and he demanded hard work from others. He unequivocally
condemned laziness and laxity in others. He could not understand why others could not be like him. When he saw others not living according to the rules, he would accuse
them of infidelity even in public. All those who were not like him he
considered them to be either thieves or rogues. Of course, no condemnation was complete
without accusing them of adultery. He often thanked God with uplifted hands that he was ‘not like the rest of mankind’.
He wanted his superiors to take strict action
against the unfaithful and disobedient members of his congregation. He would
also accuse the superiors if they happened to be friendly with these lax
members. He would boycott celebrations if these lax members also joined. He
would be very upset and angry if his superiors ever joined in their partying. As
he was influential and had financial clout superiors at times had to side with
him even if it meant injustice to the others. It is not that they disliked
celebrations and light moments but they did not want others to know about it. One
day my Parisian friend was having a cigarette. As I approached him he tried to
hide the cigarette behind him. He could not see the smoke that was rising
behind him as he pretended and wryly smiled. In order not to embarrass him I
quit the place at once.
To defend some of the articles of the law he would
argue, accuse, condemn and at times did not hesitate to use even violence. The
rule and the law were sacred, and in its defence, he often violated the most
important law – that of Charity. On one occasion my friend was in such a hurry
to defend a legal case that he left alone on the road a man who had met with an
accident. Punctuality and legality were
more important to him than Charity.
My friend was an enthusiastic missionary too.
He would travel to distant villages to make new converts. Often the simple
village people had very little knowledge of the rules and regulations of the Church.
They could not memorise the Prayers, nor keep all the rubrics of the liturgy
faithfully. The high expectations from my friend soon alienated him from the
people. People wanted him to be more charitable than liturgical. Unable to cope
with his demands, the people gradually skipped prayer meetings and also failed to make their contributions on time. Soon these good-willed simple people
who left their traditional ways and joined the new way of life became ‘rootless’
belonging neither ‘here nor there.’ The
plight of these people did not affect my friend much, he continued to travel to other places in search of new members while the old ones
dropped out!
There are large number of members in the Pharisian Congregation.
Since they are educated, polished in their behaviour, and well-dressed, they are
often invited to gatherings. They take it as their right to occupy the front
chair. When they are introduced, their titles and qualifications are to be
announced properly. Their names are often sand-witched between long decrees. They
are happy to display their titles and
decrees in brochures and display boards. Owe to you if you leave out their
titles and decrees and call them only just by name!
Financially, Parisians are a well-to-do Society.
They are held in high esteem by the people as teachers of the law. People
generously give donations and request their blessing in return. They eat and dress
well. They are quite generous also. Any parish priest would be happy to
have them in their parish for they give part of their earnings to the church. The
more they are praised and acknowledged, the more they are willing to give. On
feast days, they are given special crowns and seats of honour as an acknowledgement
of their contribution.
They don’t speak much except when arguing and
defending. They are best to themselves when they are practising their charism –
the legal profession.
I should have told you perhaps at the beginning
itself, that this congregation has its roots in the B.C. times. It is more than
two thousand years since the Pharisians were founded. Many Religious Congregations die out after a few
centuries of their foundation, but Pharisians have a strong following even
today. A special privilege is granted to members of any Religious Congregation or
Institute to join the Pharisians. There
are staunch followers of Pharisians within religious Congregations and Institutes. They are free to
have dual membership.
At the time of Jesus, the Pharisians were very
active. There are pieces of evidence to show that even Jesus had interaction with few of its members. But
it was clear from the beginning that their narrow interpretation of the law,
fundamentally differed from the broad interpretation of Jesus. Jesus was a
people-oriented person. He did not hesitate to go among those who transgressed
the law and even forgive them. He was
friendly with sinners and even ate with them while the Pharisians kept aloof
from such people. Jesus had a rough time with this group of ‘religious’ people.
While they accused Jesus of being a ‘friend of sinners and publicans’ Jesus’
assessment of them was that they were like ‘white-washed sepulchres’. It was a strong indictment
of a group who were thought to be ‘blameless’ and ‘holy’. Now that Jesus has given such a verdict about
them, the Church as well as Congregations that have Pharisians among their members
should seriously think of suppressing such a group.
-
T.V.
Georgesdb

A realistic description of how many live their religious life today in communities.
ReplyDelete